
In order to make it easier for the Competition Authority to uncover collusion between undertakings, rules have been established which make it possible for undertakings participating in collusion to abandon the practice. Such undertakings are rewarded for informing the competition authorities of the collusion. By exposing the collusion and cooperating with the Competition Authority in its investigation, the undertakings can avoid fines, or their fines may be substantially reduced. It should be noted that under the Competition Act, fines imposed on undertakings for serious violations of the Competition Act can amount to up to 10% of the undertakings' annual turnover. Thus, an undertaking with an annual turnover of ISK 10 billion that participates in serious and extensive collusion with its competitors over a period of years may have to pay up to ISK one billion in fines if found guilty. A cancellation or reduction of a debt would therefore probably make a great deal of difference for an undertaking.
Rules similar to those established in Iceland are in effect in the United States, the European Union and elsewhere. Experience abroad shows that the rules have led to the exposure of collusion and have greatly facilitated investigations. In view of this fact, it is considered that the benefit to society from exposing collusion between undertakings is of greater importance than the amounts of fines that are cancelled when undertakings cooperate with competition authorities in exposing such activities.
Principal points of the rules
According to the rules, the Competition Authority will cancel fines on an undertaking which would otherwise have been fined:
In order to have a fine cancelled, an undertaking must also meet the following conditions:
Even if an undertaking does not meet the conditions for having a fine cancelled, it may nevertheless meet the conditions for having the amount of a fine reduced in a case relating to collusion between undertakings.
In order to have a fine reduced, an undertaking must provide the Competition Authority with evidence which, in the Authority's opinion, represents an important addition to the evidence already in the Authority's possession. Furthermore, the undertaking must end its participation in the alleged collusion.
In assessing the extent of the reduction of the amount of the fine incurred by an undertaking, consideration is given to the point in time at which the undertaking supplied the evidence and its significance for the investigation of the case. Furthermore, the Competition Authority will take into consideration the co-operativeness of the undertaking after it supplied the evidence. If an undertaking meets the conditions for a reduced fine, the fine will be reduced as follows:
Once the Competition Authority has verified that an undertaking meets the conditions for a reduced fine, the Authority will notify the undertaking in writing. Furthermore, an undertaking requesting a reduced fine and meeting all required conditions will be informed in writing of the intention to reduce the amount of any potential fine imposed on the undertaking.
An undertaking requesting the cancellation of a fine or the reduction of a fine shall submit a request to that effect to the Competition Authority.
"*" indicates required fields