Logo Competition
Send a suggestion
Send data
Menu
  1. Home
  2. Published material
  3. News

Press release – Mjólku's competitive position unacceptable

13 October 2006
Snowcap Mountain
  • The Competition Authority directs recommendations to the Minister of Agriculture to promote changes to the provisions of the Agricultural Produce Act that hinder competition and discriminate against companies in the dairy industry, and to promote the abolition of tariffs on milk powder in order to facilitate competition in dairy industry.
  • The Competition Authority considers that Osta- og smjörsala sf. has abused its dominant market position vis-à-vis Mjólka ehf., thereby breaching competition law.

The Cheese and Butter Shop's breach of competition law
When Mjólka started operations last year with the production of feta cheese, the company had to buy milk powder from the Cheese and Butter Sales. There have been two pricing structures for milk powder: a higher price for companies in the dairy industry, and a lower price for companies in other food production.  Mjólka was made to pay the higher price for the powder, whereas another cheese-making company, Ostahúsið, had for many years been charged the lower price for its production. This prompted Mjólka to complain to the Competition Authority about the Ostasala and Smjörsala's discrimination. The Ostasala and Smjörsala responded by raising the price of milk powder for the Ostahúsið, citing a staff error. The company believed this would level the playing field between Mjólka and the Ostahúsið.

The Cheese and Butter Sales has a monopoly on the sale of milk powder in this country, as high tariffs on milk powder effectively prevent its import. Mjólka is therefore forced to buy powder from the Cheese and Butter Sales Company, which, together with its owners (the dairy co-operatives), are Mjólka's main competitors. Due to the position of the Cheese and Butter Marketing Board as described here, the company has a particularly strong obligation not to discriminate between its customers. In light of this, the Competition Authority considers that the Cheese and Butter Shop abused its dominant market position when it sold milk powder to Mjólka at one price and to Ostahúsið at another. In doing so, the Cheese and Butter Shop breached competition law.

Public restrictions on competition in the dairy industry – an opinion for the Minister of Agriculture
The aforementioned complaint by Mjólku prompted the Competition Authority to consider the general competitive barriers the company faces due to the legal framework in this market. The aforementioned import duties on milk powder effectively make it impossible for Mjólku to purchase it from anyone other than its competitor, the Cheese and Butter Sales Company. The Cheese and Butter Sales Company is owned by the dairy cooperatives, which are also Mjólku's competitors. With amendments made to the Agricultural Produce Act in 2004, dairy cooperatives were permitted to engage in price-fixing and market-sharing, thereby exempting them from competition law. Price-fixing and market-sharing by competitors are highly anti-competitive practices and subject other companies, as well as their managers, to penalties. With the 2004 amendment to the law, mergers between competitors in the dairy industry were also exempted from competition law, even if they distort competition.
Mjólka is not a member of the Association of Dairy Processing Plants. The aforementioned legal amendments enable dairy cooperatives within this association to consult with one another against attempts by Mjólka and, where applicable, other new competitors to gain a foothold in the market. The implementation of the Agricultural Produce Act also results in these competitors being handed trade secrets from Mjólka. In addition, Mjólka is required to pay a specific fee, a price transfer fee, which is used for the benefit of the company's competitors.

The aforementioned amendments to the Agricultural Produce Act from 2004 grant dairy associations a much broader exemption from competition rules than is customary in our neighbouring countries. The purpose of these legislative changes was, among other things, to enable dairy cooperatives to meet competition from abroad. The Competition Authority's opinion argues that the exemptions from competition law enjoyed by dairy cooperatives will harm their competitiveness and work against their ability to meet foreign competition, when and if it materialises in this country in this sector.

Mjólku's entry into the dairy processing market has led to a reduction in prices for the product categories it produces. It has also resulted in farmers who produce milk outside the payment limit now receiving a higher price for their milk than before. Thus, the increased competition brought about by Mjólku's operations has benefited both consumers and farmers. In light of this, the Competition Authority recommends that the Minister for Agriculture should work to remove public barriers to competition in the dairy industry, so that consumers and farmers can enjoy the benefits of competition in this sector.

The Competition Authority's recommendations to the Minister of Agriculture concern the repeal of provisions in the Agricultural Produce Act that permit anti-competitive collusion and mergers among dairy cooperatives. Also, that price and quantity surcharges on milk powder be abolished in order to facilitate competition in the dairy industry. The Minister is also urged to ensure that the competitive position of product processing plants operating outside the Dairy Processing Plants Association is otherwise equalised with that of those operating within the association. Finally, the attention of the Minister of Agriculture is drawn to the fact that recommendations from a 2002 Competition Council opinion are still in effect, calling on the minister to promote the liberalisation of wholesale pricing for agricultural produce.

Conclusion
The Competition Authority has stated that the competitive position in the food market is among the issues to which the greatest emphasis will be placed in the coming quarters.  In this context, it is worth mentioning that in December last year the Authority presented a Nordic report on competition conditions in the food market, thereby sparking extensive debate about food prices and the food market in Iceland. The Competition Authority's decision and opinion to the Minister of Agriculture, presented in this press release, are in line with the Authority's priorities and are designed to contribute to lower food prices.

Decision of the Competition Authority No. 39/2006 Submission of Mjólku ehf. concerning the abuse of a dominant position by Osta- og smjörsalan sf. and the Opinion of the Competition Authority No. 1/2006 Official restrictions on competition in the dairy industry,

Other news

All news and published material

The Court of Appeal directs the district court to consider the illegal collusion between Samskip and Eimskip.

The Court of Appeal has overturned a district court's dismissal order and directed a district judge to hear the case of the Competition Authority against Samskip...
  • 15 June 2026
  • NewsIn focus

Icelanders pay 55 per cent more for food than EU residents.

A discussion paper published today by the Competition Authority states that the price of food in Iceland is among the highest in Europe. Thus, Icelanders pay a...
  • 10 June 2026
  • NewsIn focus

Merger notification regarding Lyfju's acquisition of Borgar Apótek withdrawn

Lyfja hf. has notified the Competition Authority that the company and the owner of XY-lyfja ehf., which operates Borgar Apótek, have reached an agreement to drop...
  • 5th June 2026
  • News
Páll Gunnar Pálsson, Director-General of the Competition Authority. Composite image/CAP

The Competition Authority monitors the Norwegians' review of the banking market

The Norwegian competition authority has launched a review of competition in the country's banking market. This is the first step towards a possible market investigation...
  • 28 May 2026
  • News

The Norwegian Competition Authority is reviewing the banking market

The Norwegian Competition Authority has launched a review of competition in the country's banking market, and this is the first step towards a possible market investigation...
  • 27 May 2026
  • News

Comments sought on the merger of TVG Zimsen / Eimskips and Cargo Express

The Competition Authority is reviewing the merger between TVG Zimsen, Eimskip and Cargo Express. Cargo Express primarily sells transport services by freight flight...
  • 26 May 2026
  • News

In light of the coverage of the „Competition Authority's rules“ and mass redundancies

In media coverage of the collective redundancies at Berjaya Hotels Iceland, in connection with a possible takeover of the operation of Berjaya hotels by Icelandair Hotels, it has been reported, among other things, that...
  • 22 May 2026
  • News

The Competition Authority advises Storytel to exercise caution.

The Competition Authority advises Storytel to exercise caution in its marketing and pricing offers at a sensitive time when a new entrant is testing the waters in the market...
  • 22 May 2026
  • News

Kaldalón's purchase of FÍ Fasteignafélags properties approved

The Competition Authority has concluded its review of Kaldalóns hf.'s acquisition of all properties owned by FÍ Fasteignafélags slhf. The Authority's conclusion is that the merger...
  • 11 May 2026
  • News
Logo Competition
Borgartún 26, 105 Reykjavík
PO Box: 5120
Telephone: 585 0700

Shortcuts

  • Solutions
  • Laws and regulations
  • Complaints and enquiries
  • Instructional pages

Subjects

  • Subjects
  • Illegal collusion
  • Dominant market position
  • Merger case
  • Competition and the public sector
  • Market research

Competition Authority

  • About the Competition Authority
  • Governance and administration
  • Planning and strategy
  • Human resources
  • Procedure
  • Appellate Board
  • International cooperation
  • The symbol of the Competition Authority
  • Administrative review
  • Privacy Policy
New website (Beta)
Send a suggestion
Send data
  • Solutions
  • Decisions
  • Opinion
  • Reviews
  • Rulings
  • Reports and publications
  • Subjects
  • Illegal collusion
  • Dominant market position
  • Merger case
  • Competition and the public sector
  • Market research
  • Education
  • Market definitions
  • Competitive indicators
  • Instructional pages
  • A conversation about competition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Complaints and enquiries
  • Laws and regulations
  • Published material
  • News
  • Blog posts
  • In focus
  • Videos
  • Speeches and presentations
  • Reduction of VAT on fuel
  • About the Competition Authority
  • Governance and administration
  • Planning and strategy
  • Human resources
  • Procedure
  • Appellate Board
  • International cooperation
  • The symbol of the Competition Authority
  • Administrative review
  • Contact Us

Search

Leita..

The artificial intelligence is thinking...

New website samkeppni.is

The other day, it was launched. Beta version of a new website. We welcome all suggestions and comments regarding the new website via the form below.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.