The Conseil de la concurrence implements the leniency procedure for the first time and fines two national cartels
The Conseil de la concurrence has handed down a decision penalising nine companies in the sector of wooden door manufacturing for engaging in price agreements. The fines amount to 5 million euros pursuant to national and European Competition Law.
In the first application of its new leniency programme – details are available on the website www.conseil-concurrence.fr – the Conseil has exempted the company France Portes from financial penalties, which sought to take advantage of the procedure.
Given its role in the cartel, France Portes incurred a €1.25 million fine. It benefited from total immunity in compensation for the fact that the company:
The existence of a leniency procedure introduces permanent insecurity among cartels
“Leniency” is a new procedure open to companies, which may, in compensation for the denunciation of a cartel – which is unknown to the Competition authorities – in which they participated, be granted immunity at the end of the contentious procedure.
This new instrument adds to the Conseil de la concurrence's legal arsenal (injunctions, penalties, negotiated settlement procedure, commitments) and represents a powerful lever for the Conseil de la concurrence. The procedure enables a noticeable improvement in the detection of cartels, particularly horizontal cartels, which are the most serious practices, by introducing a strong element of instability among cartels: members can at any time decide to withdraw from the cartel in order to benefit from immunity.
Since its implementation, the French leniency programme has met with a certain degree of success: the Conseil has recorded 17 requests which are under consideration. 80% of the requests have been filed since 1 May 2004, when the European Network for Competition (ECN) authorities was set up.
Stages of the procedure
In the present case, France Portes requested the application of a leniency measure by denouncing a cartel operating in the wooden door sector in France in May 2002. In support of its denunciation, the company provided numerous pieces of evidence and produced a memorandum describing the main aspects concerning the history and operation of the cartel. Thereafter, the company denounced another cartel involved in lacquered doors.
The Conseil de la concurrence granted France Portes the conditional benefit of leniency in an opinion issued on 23 July 2002 and initiated proceedings ex officio. As part of this contentious procedure, the Conseil de la concurrence then immediately asked the DGCCRF to conduct an investigation, which led to searches in the following days.
The two cartels revealed
The elements provided by France Portes, along with those seized during the investigation, enabled the existence of two national cartels to be established, aimed at stabilising prices by drawing up common minimum price grids in a context of difficult market conditions for all the companies in the sector.
The first cartel, called “C5” or “the famous five”, active until the end of 2001, concerned the market for wooden flush doors. The cartel consisted of the following companies: France Portes, Ekem, Magri, Fonmarty, JH Industries, Righini, Malerba and Blocfer. These competing companies were in the habit of getting together after the meetings organised by the National Union of industrial carpentry manufacturers (SNFMI) in Bordeaux.
The second cartel, active until 2000, concerned the market for lacquered doors. It consisted of the main producers of lacquered doors, namely Frances Portes, Berkvens-Svedex and Polydex. The meetings took place about once a year in Paris.
Serious practices and the fines pronounced
Cartels are considered by competition authorities to be the most serious forms of practice; the OECD refers to them as hard-core cartels.
In this particular case, the fixing of common minimum sale prices was aimed at restricting price competition between companies that should have been competing. Price fixing also had the effect of sharing the French market by preventing foreign operators from accessing the markets concerned. However, the Conseil took into account – in determining the amount of the fines – the fact that the minimum prices had not always been applied by the members of the two cartels, thus limiting the damage caused by the cartels to the economy.
The Conseil de la concurrence decided to impose on the following companies:
Decision 06-D-09 of 11 April 2006, relative to practices implemented in the sector of door manufacturing
Competition Council
"*" indicates required fields
