Logo Competition
Send a suggestion
Send data
Menu
  1. Home
  2. Published material
  3. News

Press release – Icelandair ehf fined 190 million króna for abusing its dominant market position

30 March 2007
Snowcap Mountain

The Competition Authority has concluded that Icelandair breached competition law by abusing its dominant market position in scheduled flights on the routes between Keflavik and Copenhagen, and between Keflavik and London. The infringement took place in 2004 when Icelandair offered internet fares, so-called 'Net Clicks' amounting to 16,900 kr., in large quantities to the aforementioned destinations at a price that did not cover costs. This constitutes harmful below-cost pricing within the meaning of competition law. Icelandair offered the aforementioned illegal internet fares approximately one year after Iceland Express began scheduled flights between the destinations in question, competing with Icelandair. The Competition Authority has, by its decision, ordered Icelandair to pay a fine of 190 million króna to the state treasury.

The Competition Authority's decision can be traced to the fact that in early 2003, the low-cost airline Iceland Express began competing with Icelandair on flights between Keflavik and Copenhagen, and between Keflavik and London. Icelandair responded by offering much lower fares than had previously been available on the two routes in question, so-called 'Vorsmelli' of 14,900 kr. Iceland Express complained to the competition authorities about Icelandair's 'Vorsmelli', which were offered to prevent the company from gaining a foothold in the market. The Competition Council and, later, the Competition Appeals Board concluded in 2003 that the fares in question constituted harmful undercutting, which was an abuse of Icelandair's dominant market position and a breach of competition law.

At the beginning of 2004, Icelandair introduced new Web Specials on the relevant competitive routes. These were fares amounting to 16,900 kr., i.e. 2,000 kr. higher than the illegal 'Vorsmellir' offered in 2003. Iceland Express complained to the competition authorities about these 'Netsmellir'. It is the Competition Authority's conclusion that the Netsmellir in question did not cover their costs, as defined in the case with reference to a previous decision of the Competition Council and a ruling of the Competition Appeals Board. It is the Competition Authority's assessment that Icelandair effectively used profits from the sale of more expensive fares, such as business class fares where Icelandair has a monopoly position, to subsidise internet fares sold in competition with Iceland Express.

As previously stated, Icelandair also breached competition law in 2003 by offering the aforementioned Spring Special when Iceland Express was establishing itself in the market. By offering the so-called Summer Special in 2004, Icelandair again breached competition law. In the opinion of the Competition Authority, the aforementioned 'Netsmells' were directed against Iceland Express with the aim of weakening the company and thereby distorting competition in a market of great macroeconomic importance in Iceland.

The Competition Authority therefore considers that Icelandair's infringement was serious. In light of all the above, Icelandair is ordered to pay a fine of 190 million krónur to the state treasury.

Decision No. 11/2007.

Other news

All news and published material

The Court of Appeal directs the district court to consider the illegal collusion between Samskip and Eimskip.

The Court of Appeal has overturned a district court's dismissal order and directed a district judge to hear the case of the Competition Authority against Samskip...
  • 15 June 2026
  • NewsIn focus

Icelanders pay 55 per cent more for food than EU residents.

A discussion paper published today by the Competition Authority states that the price of food in Iceland is among the highest in Europe. Thus, Icelanders pay a...
  • 10 June 2026
  • NewsIn focus

Merger notification regarding Lyfju's acquisition of Borgar Apótek withdrawn

Lyfja hf. has notified the Competition Authority that the company and the owner of XY-lyfja ehf., which operates Borgar Apótek, have reached an agreement to drop...
  • 5th June 2026
  • News
Páll Gunnar Pálsson, Director-General of the Competition Authority. Composite image/CAP

The Competition Authority monitors the Norwegians' review of the banking market

The Norwegian competition authority has launched a review of competition in the country's banking market. This is the first step towards a possible market investigation...
  • 28 May 2026
  • News

The Norwegian Competition Authority is reviewing the banking market

The Norwegian Competition Authority has launched a review of competition in the country's banking market, and this is the first step towards a possible market investigation...
  • 27 May 2026
  • News

Comments sought on the merger of TVG Zimsen / Eimskips and Cargo Express

The Competition Authority is reviewing the merger between TVG Zimsen, Eimskip and Cargo Express. Cargo Express primarily sells transport services by freight flight...
  • 26 May 2026
  • News

In light of the coverage of the „Competition Authority's rules“ and mass redundancies

In media coverage of the collective redundancies at Berjaya Hotels Iceland, in connection with a possible takeover of the operation of Berjaya hotels by Icelandair Hotels, it has been reported, among other things, that...
  • 22 May 2026
  • News

The Competition Authority advises Storytel to exercise caution.

The Competition Authority advises Storytel to exercise caution in its marketing and pricing offers at a sensitive time when a new entrant is testing the waters in the market...
  • 22 May 2026
  • News

Kaldalón's purchase of FÍ Fasteignafélags properties approved

The Competition Authority has concluded its review of Kaldalóns hf.'s acquisition of all properties owned by FÍ Fasteignafélags slhf. The Authority's conclusion is that the merger...
  • 11 May 2026
  • News
Logo Competition
Borgartún 26, 105 Reykjavík
PO Box: 5120
Telephone: 585 0700

Shortcuts

  • Solutions
  • Laws and regulations
  • Complaints and enquiries
  • Instructional pages

Subjects

  • Subjects
  • Illegal collusion
  • Dominant market position
  • Merger case
  • Competition and the public sector
  • Market research

Competition Authority

  • About the Competition Authority
  • Governance and administration
  • Planning and strategy
  • Human resources
  • Procedure
  • Appellate Board
  • International cooperation
  • The symbol of the Competition Authority
  • Administrative review
  • Privacy Policy
New website (Beta)
Send a suggestion
Send data
  • Solutions
  • Decisions
  • Opinion
  • Reviews
  • Rulings
  • Reports and publications
  • Subjects
  • Illegal collusion
  • Dominant market position
  • Merger case
  • Competition and the public sector
  • Market research
  • Education
  • Market definitions
  • Competitive indicators
  • Instructional pages
  • A conversation about competition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Complaints and enquiries
  • Laws and regulations
  • Published material
  • News
  • Blog posts
  • In focus
  • Videos
  • Speeches and presentations
  • Reduction of VAT on fuel
  • About the Competition Authority
  • Governance and administration
  • Planning and strategy
  • Human resources
  • Procedure
  • Appellate Board
  • International cooperation
  • The symbol of the Competition Authority
  • Administrative review
  • Contact Us

Search

Leita..

The artificial intelligence is thinking...

New website samkeppni.is

The other day, it was launched. Beta version of a new website. We welcome all suggestions and comments regarding the new website via the form below.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.