Logo Competition
Send a suggestion
Send data
Menu
  1. Home
  2. Published material
  3. News

IGS Ground Services ehf. at Keflavik International Airport fined for abuse of a dominant position

29 March 2006
Snowcap Mountain

The Competition Authority has concluded that IGS Ground Services at Keflavik Airport, a subsidiary of FL Group, abused its market dominance in ground services for passenger aircraft. The company violated the Competition Act by entering into 10 exclusive purchase agreements with airlines landing at Keflavik International Airport and by making an anti-competitive offer to the airline LTU. In its decision, the Competition Authority imposed an administrative fine of ISK 80 million on the company, to be paid to the State Treasury. The case has been referred to the Appeals Committee.

IGS holds a dominant position in providing ground services to passenger aircraft at the Leif Eiriksson Air Terminal, where the company has a market share of over 95%. Until 2001, the company (previously Flugleidir) had an exclusive licence to service passenger aircraft at Keflavik Airport. In 2001, the company Vallarvinir entered into competition with IGS. Subsequently, the price of ground handling services fell significantly at Keflavik Airport. Nevertheless, IGS retained its dominance of the market, as in fact the company was responsible for all handling and services for its sister company, Icelandair, which accounts for a large proportion of all the business relating to ground services for passenger aircraft at Keflavik Airport.

It constitutes a violation of the Competition Act when a dominant undertaking imposes an obligation on a buyer to purchase all services, or a significant part of such services, from that undertaking. In order to maintain its dominance of the market, IGS entered into such exclusive agreements with terms of 2-3 years with ten airlines which were doing business with the company. In this way, competition for important customers was made impossible, and these actions taken by IGS had the effect of seriously disrupting competition. It is the conclusion of the Competition Authority that the said agreements constituted an abuse by IGS of its dominant position.

One of the airlines that entered into business with Vallarvinir in 2001 was the German airline LTU. It had previously been doing business with IGS (Flugleidir), which at that time, as stated earlier, had an exclusive licence to provide ground services to passenger aircraft at Keflavik Airport. The documents of the case reveal that LTU had been of the opinion that it was enduring monopolistic pricing on the part of IGS (Flugleidir), and paying approximately 50% higher price than elsewhere in Europe before Vallarvinir entered the scene and started competing.

Early in 2004, IGS approached LTU, which was then doing business under contract with Vallarvinir. IGS made an offer to LTU involving a considerable reduction from the price paid by the airline to Vallarvinir. The IGS price offer was lower than the price Vallarvinir believed they were able to offer, and LTU transferred its business from Vallarvinir to IGS in the middle of the 2004 tourist season. In this way, IGS managed to attract Vallarvinir's biggest customer. After attracting LTU's business from Vallarvinir, IGS has since made further offers to customers of Vallarvinir for the purpose of attracting their business.

It is the conclusion of the Competition Authority that there was no commercial basis for the price offer made by the company to LTU. The company's ground services for passenger aircraft were operated at a loss in 2004. It is the assessment of the Competition Authority that the offer made by IGS to LTU was a direct and specific action directed against Vallarvinir and intended to reduce the scope of that company's business, and thereby competition in an important market which has an impact on a large segment of the tourist industry in Iceland.

The Competition Authority imposed a fine of ISK 80 million for the above violations of Article 11 of the Competition Act.

With its decision No. 3/2006, dated 5 July 2006, the Competition Appeals Committee confirmed the above decision of the Competition Authority. The Appeals Committee decided that IGS should pay an administrative fine of ISK 60,000,000, thereby reducing the originally determined fines by ISK 20 million. 

Other news

All news and articles

In light of the coverage of the „Competition Authority's rules“ and mass redundancies

  • 22 May 2026
  • News

The Competition Authority advises Storytel to exercise caution.

  • 22 May 2026
  • News

Kaldalón's purchase of FÍ Fasteignafélags properties approved

  • 11 May 2026
  • News

Monitoring necessary in a monopolistic market

  • 4th May 2026
  • NewsIn focus

The Competition Authority tasked with monitoring fuel pricing

  • 30 April 2026
  • NewsIn focus

„It is of enormous benefit to Icelandic society that there is competition in the financial market.“

  • 27 April 2026
  • NewsIn focus

Summer job for economics students at SKE

  • 22 April 2026
  • News
Composite image/SKE

Merger of Hekla and Bílson – consultation process

  • 20 April 2026
  • News
The Competition Authority has concluded that the merger of Ferro Zink ehf. and Metal ehf. hinders effective competition and must therefore be annulled.

The Competition Authority annuls the merger of Ferro Zink and Metal

  • 17 April 2026
  • News
Logo Competition
Borgartún 26, 105 Reykjavík
PO Box: 5120
Telephone: 585 0700

Shortcuts

  • Solutions
  • Laws and regulations
  • Complaints and enquiries
  • Instructional pages

Subjects

  • Subjects
  • Illegal collusion
  • Dominant market position
  • Merger case
  • Competition and the public sector
  • Market research

Competition Authority

  • About the Competition Authority
  • Governance and administration
  • Planning and strategy
  • Human resources
  • Procedure
  • Appellate Board
  • International cooperation
  • The symbol of the Competition Authority
  • Administrative review
  • Privacy Policy
New website (Beta)
Send a suggestion
Send data
  • Solutions
  • Decisions
  • Opinion
  • Reviews
  • Rulings
  • Reports
  • Subjects
  • Illegal collusion
  • Dominant market position
  • Merger case
  • Competition and the public sector
  • Market research
  • Education
  • Market definitions
  • Competitive indicators
  • Instructional pages
  • A conversation about competition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Complaints and enquiries
  • Laws and regulations
  • Published material
  • News
  • Blog posts
  • In focus
  • Videos
  • Speeches and presentations
  • Articles
  • Reduction of VAT on fuel
  • About the Competition Authority
  • Governance and administration
  • Planning and strategy
  • Human resources
  • Procedure
  • Appellate Board
  • International cooperation
  • The symbol of the Competition Authority
  • Administrative review
  • Contact Us

Search

Leita..

The artificial intelligence is thinking...

New website samkeppni.is

The other day, it was launched. Beta version of a new website. We welcome all suggestions and comments regarding the new website via the form below.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.